Mon historique
Flux RSS
Me connecter
Le portail documentaire DOCautisme
Le portail documentaire DOCautisme se donne l'ambition d’être une référence francophone sur les publications et ressources nationales et internationales consacrées aux Troubles du Spectre de l’Autisme.
Le GNCRA ne saurait être tenu pour responsable de l’utilisation tronquée, erronée ou délétère de toute information trouvée sur le portail DOCautisme.
Le GNCRA vous encourage à prendre connaissance des recommandations de bonne pratique professionnelle émises par la Haute Autorité de Santé.
| Titre : | The psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the social responsiveness scale in a neuropediatric sample (2022) |
| Auteurs : | Sabine KAISER, Auteur ; Kjersti Åby BERGQUIST, Auteur ; Marianne Berg HALVORSEN, Auteur |
| Type de document : | Article : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique |
| Dans : | Research in autism spectrum disorders (95, juillet 2022) |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Concepts : | SRS ; Norvège ; Trouble du neurodéveloppement ; Trouble neurologique ; Enfant ; Adolescent ; Evaluation psychométrique ; Vineland ; Outil d'évaluation du comportement |
| Index. décimale : | AUT.43 (Evaluation) |
| Résumé : |
Background
The current study is an examination of the psychometric properties of the Norwegian Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), a measure of deficits in social behavior, in a neuropediatric outpatient sample of children and adolescents with neurological and neurodevelopmental disorders. Method The internal consistency of the SRS, the convergent validity of the SRS with the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale-II (VABS-II), the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), and the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) were examined, in addition to four different factor models of the SRS (i.e., a one-factor, the original five-factor, a second-order five-factor model, and a 16-item one-factor model) using confirmatory factor analyses. Results There was satisfactory internal consistency on all subscales, except for the Social Awareness subscale. The SRS showed a somewhat meaningful overlap with parts of the related scales on the VABS-II, the SDQ, and the ABC. Model fit indices were mixed for evaluating the four different factor models. Overall, however, the model fit was rather poor. Conclusions The original SRS subscales showed adequate internal consistency and satisfactory convergent validity on some of the subscales. The construct validity in terms of factor structure was not acceptable. Future research should examine the psychometric properties of an improved version of the SRS, especially in terms of improving the scale’s construct validity. [résumé d'auteur] |
| Sous-type : | Article |
| Consulter : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2022.101973 |
